Women s Rights Of Women - 1272 Words

Throughout history, women have fought a strenuous battle for equal rights. Many men, and even some women, all over the world believe that women do not share the same value and importance to society as men do. On September 5, 1995, Hillary Clinton spoke at the 4th World Conference on Women, on behalf of women all over the world. Clinton raised awareness on how women s rights are being violated and why it is important to recognize women s rights as equal to everyone else’s rights. Even today, in 2016, the words Clinton in 1995 spoke still impact the world. Hillary Clinton, a powerful, credible woman, touched the world by explaining the mental, and physical hardships that many women face every day, and how addressing this problem will†¦show more content†¦Women have a hard time supporting their families, when they are sick with disease that are preventable, have very little income, and have minimal schooling. Clinton argues how this affects families, communities and eve n the nation. While some women fights to gain access to things that will help their families live a better life, other women are having their rights violated in appalling ways. Secondly, Clinton voiced how all around the world, in South Africa, Indonesia, America and many other countries, women have to bare many violent acts everyday. Clinton’s speech shocked us with the reality of the abuse and violence women have to face daily. Many women are being abused and raped in their own homes and communities. Violence is one of the leading causes of death for women ages 14-44 (Clinton). Unfortunately, the majority of the perpetrator’s are their own husband, relative’s, and neighbors, people they know and trust. Many women have to live in fear of their communities because of these events. Clinton also brought attention to the reality of rape of women in wars. In many wars, women have been subjected to rape as a tactic to make these men seem more powerful. The rape of wo men weakens the home and towns they live in. Hillary Clinton’s speech is remarkable not only because of the unbelievable reality women endure, but also because of her credibility. She was able to deliver such an exceptional speech because of her

Contingency Approach to Management in Business Free Essays

Contingency Approach to Management Published on March 20, 2007 by NIKMAHAJAN in Business and Society Comments (26)|39 Liked It The contingency approach believes that it is impossible to select one way of managing that works best in all situations like promoted by Taylor. The contingency approach believes that it is impossible to select one way of managing that works best in all situations like promoted by Taylor.Their approach is to identify the conditions of a task (scientific management school), managerial job (administrative management school) and person (human relations school) as parts of a complete management situation and attempt to integrate them all into a solution which is most appropriate for a specific circumstance. We will write a custom essay sample on Contingency Approach to Management in Business or any similar topic only for you Order Now Contingency refers to the immediate (contingent or touching) circumstances. The manager has to systematically try to identify which technique or approach will be the best solution for a problem which exists in a particular circumstance or context.An example of this is the never ending problem of increasing productivity. The different experts would offer the following solutions: Behavioral scientist: create a climate which is psychologically motivating; Classical management approach: create a new incentive scheme; Contingency approach: both ideas are viable and it depends on the possible fit of each solution with the goals, structure and resources of the organization. . The contingency approach may consider, for policy reasons, that an incentive scheme was not relevant. The complexity of each situation should be noted and decisions made in each individual circumstance. Read more in Business and Society  « Management Science SchoolBooming Opportunity  » It should be realized that the contingency approach is not really new because Taylor already emphasized the importance of choosing the general type of management best suited to a particular case. Henri Fayol, in turn, also found that there is nothing rigid or absolute in management affairs. Similar ideas were expressed in the 1920s, by Mary Parker Follett (1865-1933) who was greatly interested in social work and was a genius for relating individual experience to general principles.Her concept of the law of the situation referred to the necessity of acting in accordance with the specific requirements of a given situation. She noted that these requirements were constantly changing and needed continuous efforts to maintain effective working relationships. The contingency approach seeks to apply to real life situations ideas drawn from various schools of management thought. They claim that no one app roach is universally applicable and different problems and situations require different approaches. Managers must try to find the approach that is the best for them in a certain given situation, so they can achieve their goals.It is important to note that the contingency approach stresses the need for managers to examine the relationship between the internal and external environment of an organization. Critics of the contingency approach have blamed it to lack theoretical foundation and are basically intuitive. Managers today are advised to analyze a situation and use ideas from the various schools of thought to find an appropriate combination of management techniques to meet the needs of the situation.Read more: http://bizcovering. com/business-and-society/contingency-approach-to-management/#ixzz17zRjciE2 How to cite Contingency Approach to Management in Business, Papers

Wild Bill Kickok Essays - American Folklore, Tall Tales,

Wild Bill Kickok 1. Character vs. character Wild Bill vs. Dave McCanles - David McCanles employed Bill and always bullied other people. Dave had tried many times to get Bill to fight him. A man named Horace Wellman owed Dave some money but did not have any way of repaying McCanles. One day, after Horace had come back from trying to get some money at a larger town, McCanles and two others arrived at Wellman's house, where Bill was staying. McCanles called Wellman out, but instead, got shot by Bill. The other two fled, Bill dropping one dead, and fatally injuring another, that was later found dead on a river bank. Bill was cleared of the shootings. Solution: Fight McCanles face to face. Character vs. character Wild Bill vs. Dave Tutt - Dave Tutt was a man constantly bullying weaker men, and wanted a reputation by killing Wild Bill. Tutt stole Bill's watch that he had gotten from his father. Bill met Tutt at the town square, where Tutt was shot dead. Bill was found not guilty seeing that Tutt had antagonized him for so long. Solution: Kill Tutt for stealing his watch. Character vs. Nature Wild Bill vs. the wolves - One night, when Bill was in his early teens, Bill faced a pack of wolves attacking his livestock outside of his home. Bill killed two wolves before the rest of the pack fled. Solution: Shoot a few wolves and scare the others away. Character vs. Society Wild Bill vs. New York - Bill's old friend, Will Cody a.k.a. Buffalo Bill, asked Wild Bill to come to New York and perform in his wild west show. Bill did not like New York and hated performing because he thought he looked stupid. After a hard time given to him by the owner and Buffalo Bill, Wild Bill walked out on the show returning for the plains. Solution: Leave the show and do what you want to do. 2. Wild Bill Kickok - smart, rugged, quick, strong, adventurous, stands up for whet is right. Buffalo Bill - helpful,celebrity, loves being the center of attention. Agnes Lake - beautiful, smart, caring. I can relate to Wild Bill because he always stands up for those in need or in trouble. I'd like to meet Wild Bill and Buffalo Bill because they were big figures that helped shape the west. Wild Bill and Buffalo Bill would probably be my friends because they never really hated anyone unless they wanted them dead, and I wouldn't want to be in a duel against either of them. 3. After reading this book, I know a little bit more about how the west was settled. What I liked about it was how Bill always ended up in something famous like the Civil War, Underground Railroad, Sante Fe and Oregon Trails, and the War with the Indians. The only part I disliked was the fact Bill was shot in the back. The life of Wild Bill reminded me of Forrest Gump. He didn't go around looking to be famous and always ended up in crucial situations that had great effects on the course of history. 4. At the end of the book, Charlie Utter said, "You saved many, many more lives than those claimed by your deadly six-shooters. Yours was a job well done." To me it shows that just a few shots saved more lives and settled more land than a war would do for the same cause. I think the author means an extraordinary job was done by an extraordinary man that any other man would've failed. 5. This book relates to today in such a good way. It shows that one man can do things to change so many peoples lives by doing so little. A good lesson to learn from this book is that no matter how high the odds are against you, you should always fight to accomplish your dream. 6. This book is hard to believe because of one man doing so many things that had an affect on history. The twists that got me were when he'd move to another part of the plains and something happened to him there. I just that over the course of so many years the things he had done had been multiplied a couple times beyond what really happened. 7. This book has made me think a lot more about the individuals that helped settle the west more than the type of people that settled the west. It showed

Free Essays on Mau-mau

The Mau-Mau Rebellion (1952 to 1959) Mau Mau rebellion certainly reveals aspects of the history of British imperialism in Africa previously hidden from view. Some historians describe the participants in the uprising as a "gang of freedom fighters called ‘Mau Mau', who vowed to free Kenya from colonialism at any cost....To the British, the uprising was such an outrageous attack on colonialism, that it justified any response, and that response when it came, would be brutal and shocking." Kenya before the uprising, was full of Europeans living a life of idle luxury based on African land and labour. But in the post-Second World War era, resentment against colonial rule increased and one by one, African countries demanded self-rule. John Maina Kahihu from the Mau Mau's political wing said, "In 1942 we had fought for the British. But when we came home from the war they gave us nothing." The fiercest opposition to the colonial authorities came from the Kikuyu tribe who, 50 years earlier, had been evicted from their traditional areas to make way for the European farmers. By the end of the Second World War, 3,000 European settlers owned 43,000 square kilometres of the most fertile land, only 6 percent of which they cultivated. The African population of 5.25 million occupied, without ownership rights, less than 135,000 square kilometres of the poorest land. On the "native reserves" much of the land was unsuitable for agriculture. The poor peasants had been forced to abandon their traditional methods of extensive agriculture and did not have access to the new technology that would make intensive agriculture viable. The population could not feed itself and the peasants were desperate. This brought about the formation of a secret society amongst the Kikuyu, Kenya's largest tribe, one-fifth of the population. It was called the Land Freedom Army (LFA). It was forcing Kikuyu to swear an oath to take back the land the white man had stolen... Free Essays on Mau-mau Free Essays on Mau-mau The Mau-Mau Rebellion (1952 to 1959) Mau Mau rebellion certainly reveals aspects of the history of British imperialism in Africa previously hidden from view. Some historians describe the participants in the uprising as a "gang of freedom fighters called ‘Mau Mau', who vowed to free Kenya from colonialism at any cost....To the British, the uprising was such an outrageous attack on colonialism, that it justified any response, and that response when it came, would be brutal and shocking." Kenya before the uprising, was full of Europeans living a life of idle luxury based on African land and labour. But in the post-Second World War era, resentment against colonial rule increased and one by one, African countries demanded self-rule. John Maina Kahihu from the Mau Mau's political wing said, "In 1942 we had fought for the British. But when we came home from the war they gave us nothing." The fiercest opposition to the colonial authorities came from the Kikuyu tribe who, 50 years earlier, had been evicted from their traditional areas to make way for the European farmers. By the end of the Second World War, 3,000 European settlers owned 43,000 square kilometres of the most fertile land, only 6 percent of which they cultivated. The African population of 5.25 million occupied, without ownership rights, less than 135,000 square kilometres of the poorest land. On the "native reserves" much of the land was unsuitable for agriculture. The poor peasants had been forced to abandon their traditional methods of extensive agriculture and did not have access to the new technology that would make intensive agriculture viable. The population could not feed itself and the peasants were desperate. This brought about the formation of a secret society amongst the Kikuyu, Kenya's largest tribe, one-fifth of the population. It was called the Land Freedom Army (LFA). It was forcing Kikuyu to swear an oath to take back the land the white man had stolen...

The Prefix Co-

The Prefix Co- The Prefix Co- The Prefix Co- By Mark Nichol If you’re the betting type, and you wager on whether a given word beginning with a prefix is attached directly to the root word or linked with a hyphen, bet against the hyphen: The trend- in American English, at least- is to close prefixed words and compound words. However, you won’t always win, because there are exceptions, even among words beginning with a particular prefix. Take the prefix co-, for example. Using the Merriam-Webster’s website as the authority, we can see that virtually every word beginning with the prefix is closed. Exceptions include most words in which the root word begins with o, including co-official, co-organizer, and co-owner. Co-op takes a hyphen when it serves as an abbreviation for cooperative, even though the full term is not hyphenated- though it, like many other words containing prefixes, once was. (However, the unrelated term coop, referring to a shelter for birds or other animals, has no hyphen.) In British English, which is generally more conservative about orthography and word treatment, the correct form is co-operative (and co-operate and co-operation). Co-opt, however, is standard in both dominant forms of English. An all-but-obsolete treatment of such words to signal that the o’s are separated by a syllabic break- this style quaintly persists in the pages of the New Yorker- is the inclusion of a diaresis (two dots) over the second instance. Avoid attempting to attach the prefix to a phrase, as in â€Å"co-personal assistant,† which fails because it describes an assistant who is co-personal, not a personal assistant who shares responsibility with another person holding that title. A natural solution is to employ a slightly sturdier en dash in place of the hyphen to convey the prefix’s relationship to the entire phrase, not just the first word (equivalent to the stronger symbol’s usage in such phrases as â€Å"pre–Industrial Revolution†), but this strategy is not standard; instead, merely substitute co- with fellow. Finally, avoid the prefix altogether if it is always redundant, as in copartner, and consider doing so if, in context, it is often so, as in co-conspirator. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Spelling category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:100 Beautiful and Ugly WordsWhat is the Difference Between Metaphor and Simile?Drama vs. Melodrama

Modern China Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Modern China - Essay Example When Europeans and Americans started to recognize the Chinese people, the traditional intellectual Chinese started to take part in the political and economic systems of China. The most significant evidence was that Sun Yat-sen overthrew the Qing rule and established the Republic of China. 2.What are your ideologies? Why are they suitable for 1905s China and better than your rivals? My ideologies are about reforms. Being a reformer in Chinas 1905s during the Qing dynasty would mean overcoming the bureaucratic structures of the government. As a reformer, I would recommend and implement various reforms in the military, administrative, and fiscal systems to eliminate bureaucracies and encourage coordination and representation in all decision-making activities of the government. Like in the Boxer Protocol, reforms would include improvement in the tax systems, subsidies, and benefits offered by the government. The tax reforms would include enforcement and collection of land taxes to reduce inefficiencies and conflicts in the lenient approach of landowning. The revenue received from taxation would be used to improve various sectors of the economy including irrigation, roads, schools, and charities and benefits to needy members of the society such as old people and people living with disabilities. There should also be reforms in the electoral system in which the people would have more power and independence to choose their leaders. The reforms also involved changes in the legal code and abolition of the examination system.

Determinism,compatibilism, and libertarianism Essay

Determinism,compatibilism, and libertarianism - Essay Example Since the beginnings of human civilization people have been seeking the ideal path to achieving a productive, successful, healthy, and happy society. There are several different theories conceived and developed aimed at achieving it. Unfortunately, many of these ideas are not remotely in agreement and some downright contradict one another. Each one claiming to have the answer as to the nature of mankind, why human beings behave as they do, and how best for them to live within and perceive society. Determinism, compatibilism, and libertarianism are three prime examples of philosophical concepts, each having strong historical support and criticisms. While each ideology has logical arguments supporting its validity they, also, have internal flaws that may lead to negative outcomes; therefore determining which, if any, is the most likely to be the best, or correct, answer to ideal human society and perspective on human reality if no easy feat. What is free will? If so, does it exist? The answer is not as simple as you think. If you define free will as being the idea that reality plays out according to the millions of individual choices and decisions we make based on wants and desires, both, great and small, then the ideology behind Determinism may not be for you. However, if you believe that scientific principles, psychological motivators, and persistent causative events outside ones’ control and force every choice that you make; even the sense of choice is, essentially, a false perception, then you would be a poor libertarian. If you believe that, although many causative events play a part in influencing our decisions and behaviors, but, on occasion those causative elements are absent, allowing for certain choices to be made solely by want and desire beyond needs and if you believe that perhaps both could coexist, then you might fit in nicely in the company of compatibilists. However, do not look for support from the determinists and libertarians, both cons ider the idea of coexistence as illogical, not plausible, and impossible. (Pecorino, 2000) In order to understand, determinism, capatibilism, and libertarianism better, as well as, assess the differing strengths and weaknesses, it is necessary to discuss and review each theory individually. Determinism in its, most basic form, can be defined as a belief system that adheres to the ideology that all things in nature are subject to the cause and effect principal, human behavior included. For this reason human beings are not responsible for their behavior because the actions and behaviors exhibited by people are directly a response to causal or set of causal events, entirely outside their control. More so, determinists believe that all things follow the natural law and that behaviors can, in fact, be predicted, if enough causal variables are known.(Pecorino, 2000) Simply put, determinists look at the world at given period in time and apply the â€Å"natural laws,† or clearly defi ned understanding of what is true, and then relating that to what will inevitably be in the future.(Newall, 2005)There are 4 specific factors that are believed to play a huge role as causative factors in the actions and behaviors of human beings; 1. Human Nature: determinists claim that human beings are subject to the instincts and biological imperatives outside of their conscious control. 2. Environment: human behavior can be attributed to their response to environmental factors that, essentially, forcing their hand. 3. Psychological Forces: Not unlike human nature, psychological drives influence behavior, again, outside one’s control. 4. Social Dynamic: human beings are directly subject to the rules, laws, and societal constructs of their communities, which, also, influences human behavior. Ultimately, the overall reigning element of determinism that characterizes and creates criticism of it is that it holds firmly that human free will is an illusion that we